Mars coverup?

I'm still annoyed that the following was put up on the BBC and removed within minutes (inserted text at the end of this post)... It isn't like such a real news organization to remove anything. They would typically leave the link and have something stating that an error was made and why the original posting was removed. I guess we'll never know how deep the control runs at nasa.

It is really ashame becuase nasa is spending billions and billions (there's the Carl Sagan ghost again) of TAXPAYERS' money to investigate many things including these areas only to give false photos (doctored) or no images (just links to all black) when they could easily end the babble on both sides of the argument by simply posting the actual photos that were taken live... NASA was set-up for the people as a non-miliatary, non-intelligence agency, although it has always been run by former or current CIA, DIA, NSA.

There have been many issues lately that leave questions unanswered. Most notably this:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3232035.ece

The Times refers to the "Times of London." One of the oldest, most notable news organizations in the world... And they ran this... Clearly looks like it could be a humanoid figure... There were others where fossils were seen in the photos and nasa ground them up without taking closer images or running any additional tests...

I am not a conspiracy buff or nut, but come'on now - like I said it can be clearly ended by not holding back the photos for months and by actually puting the original images online without editing.

________
"Feed: BBC News Science/Nature World EditionPosted on: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 10:16 AMAuthor: BBC News Science/Nature World EditionSubject: Artifacts of interest could have been found Nasa admits

Nasa stated today that “artifacts of interest” could have been found on both the moon and mars. This after groups have been pressuring the agency concerning non-natural oddities most famous of which being the face at Cydonia."